REGULATORY
UPDATES


REGULATORY UPDATE
- Tom Vichroski
Regulatory Update
At its September meeting the CIR tabled two items—Basic Violet 3 and
Licorice extracts in order to have time to obtain more data. During studies in
the ‘80s, Gentian Violet, aka Basic Violet 1 and Basic Violet 3, were shown to
be a carcinogen in mice. Basic Violet 3 is a hair colorant. The European Union
has banned Basic Violet 3 but the reasons why that action was taken are unclear.
Although CIR is leaning toward approving the various forms of Glycyrrhiza Glabra
(Licorice) Extracts, the item was tabled to allow more time for review of the
primary safety data documents. …………
At the same meeting: Thiolglycolates, PPG Methyl Ethers and the Aminomethyl
Propanol group were determined safe as used. Piper Methysticum (Kava Kava) was
found to have insufficient data. Tentative safe as used was listed for
2,4-Diaminophenoxyethanol, p-Methyl-
aminophenol and p-Phenylenediamine. The conclusion for DM Hydantoin was
insufficient data. Dilauryl Thiodipropionate, the Jojoba Oil group, Tall Oil
Acid, Hydroxyethylcellulose, Shellac, Coconut Oil and Butyl Myristate were all
reopened under CIR’s normal re-review process. With the exception of corn silk
which lacked sufficient safety data, all items in the Zea Mays (Corn) group were
tentatively determined as safe. …………
Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) has criticized FDA for not allowing the public to
take part in the International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulations.
According to Kerry, "In order to ensure a more complete system of public
health protection, it is critical to include the view of the consumer and public
health community" The ICCR’s first meeting in Brussels, September 27,
included regulatory agencies from the U.S., Canada, the E.U. and Japan. CTFA,
which was allowed to attend the meeting, has urged FDA’s CFSAN office to make
global harmonization an A-list priority for fiscal 2008. …………
FDA’s Office of Cosmetics and Colors has recently had its budget
increased by two million dollars. CTFA president and CEO Pamela Bailey commented
that "This increase will enhance consumer protections and provide the
cosmetics office with much needed inspectors and compliance officers. … This
funding increase will allow critical FDA participation in international
discussions" …………
The National Advertising Division has agreed that submitted data shows the
Neutrogena’s "best," "strongest" and
"longest-lasting" claims are substantiated for its Helioplex-containing
sun-care products introduced in January. Helioplex is a patented technology
that combines avobenzone with diethyl 2,6-oxybenzone to prevent degradation on
exposure to sunlight. Neutrogena’s product claims an SPF70 and the ‘highest
UVA protection.’ Neutrogena uses the persistent pigment darkening method to
substantiate its UVA claim. …………
The European Commission has determined that more data is necessary to
substantiate the safety of propyl, buytl, isopropyl and isobutyl
paraben. …………
In a general policy statement about its role in regulating nanotechnology
products, FDA has stated that "FDA has only limited authority over some
potentially high-risk products, e.g. cosmetics." "Many products are
regulated only if they cause adverse health-related events in use. To date there
have been comparatively few resources available to assess the risk of these
products." The FDA’s Nanotechnology Task Force had previously stated that
"current science does not support a finding that classes of products with
nanoscale materials present greater safety concerns than classes of products
without nanoscale materials." Meanwhile Friends of the Earth recently
released the results of their survey looking for nanoscale ingredients in 120
sunscreen products. They found nine products were nanoparticle free, twenty-four
products contained nanoparticles and ninety-five products were "unclear or
chose not to respond." Friends of the Earth cautioned "Sun worshippers
beware. While slathering up with sunscreens to block dangerous rays, you may be
exposing yourself to a new danger. Sunscreen manufacturers are adding
nanoparticles to sunscreens without labeling and reliable safety
information." ………..
The European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Products has stated
that phthalates in cosmetic products at current levels pose no
significant risk to consumers.